Arguing that American homes should be more like cruise ship staterooms

What if American housing was more like staterooms on cruise ships rather than large single-family homes?

Photo by Banu Acar on Pexels.com

My family went on a cruise last year over Christmas, and our week aboard the ship convinced me that we’ve got our ideals around home all wrong. The ideal American house shouldn’t be a single-family home with a big yard out in the suburbs. It should be a stateroom on a cruise ship.

Staterooms on cruise ships are famously compact and likely smaller than the bedroom you’ve left behind. But here’s what you get instead: a top deck with multiple pools, hot tubs, and a splash pad, layered atop a mall food court, stacked on top of entertainment venues ranging from a piano bar and a pub with live music to a comedy club and theaters with multiple performances a night. If you want to relax, you can grab a seat by the pool or hot tub. If you want activity, there’s a track, a gym, rock-climbing walls, and a basketball court that transforms into a bumper-car track a couple of hours a day. If you’re hungry, or if a small person is pestering you for a snack, there’s pizza, tacos, soft serve, and just about anything else you might want available nearly all day long. Whatever you and your family enjoy in a vacation, chances are you can find it on board.

Royal Caribbean’s new Oasis class of ships labels its different zones “neighborhoods,” as if to invoke the longing so many of us have for distinct, walkable communities. The “Central Park” neighborhood, for example, really does provide a kind of uncanny valley version of an urban street scene, where you and your spouse can sit outside at a wine bar while your kids wander freely. The “Boardwalk” neighborhood calls up nostalgic memories of festivals and ocean-front piers…

And that’s the lesson of a cruise, I think: A dream home doesn’t need a spacious primary bath or walk-in pantry. What matters even more than a grand entryway or a two-car garage is space and time to gather with people we love, and people we haven’t met yet.

This argument would resonate with those who like denser, walkable neighborhoods and communities. Residents can still have private settings they find comfortable but they have easy access to social and entertainment options.

But I wonder how many people would find this model attractive when single-family homes are an option many like. Is a stateroom big enough for household members to have their own space? It may not need to be a lot of private space but I also recall the conversations during COVID when all the people stuck at home tried to carve out spaces in their residences. Where would households store all their stuff? Does that stateroom come with a garage, basement, or storage facility? Some may not like shared walls or the homeowner’s association that comes with the stateroom or the parking issues they fear in denser settings. This may all work for a vacation when people have a short-term commitment but how many American residents would adopt this for years.

I wonder if there is a developer who would simply plop a cruise ship model into an existing American community. This version might not be able to sail for interesting locales but the idea of having many options nearby for a price would appeal to some. Imagine the Royal Caribbean development in a suburb.

Slowdown in exurban growth

New estimates from the US Census suggest that growth in the exurbs has slowed in recent years:

The annual rate of growth in American cities and surrounding urban areas has now surpassed that of exurbs for the first time in at least 20 years, spanning the most recent era of sprawling suburban development…

“The heyday of exurbs may well be behind us,” Yale University economist Robert J. Shiller said. Shiller, co-creator of a Standard & Poor’s housing index, is perhaps best known for identifying the risks of a U.S. housing bubble before it actually burst in 2006-2007. Examining the current market, he believes America is now at a turning point, shifting away from faraway suburbs to cities amid persistently high gasoline prices…

About 10.6 million Americans reside in the nation’s exurbs, just 5 percent of the number in large metropolitan areas. That number for exurbs represents annual growth of just 0.4 percent from 2010 to 2011, smaller than the 0.8 percent rate for cities and their surrounding urban areas. Still, it also represents the largest one-year growth drop for exurbs in at least 20 years…

In all, 99 of the 100 fastest-growing exurbs and outer suburbs saw slower or no growth in 2011 compared with the mid-decade housing peak – the exception being Spotsylvania County, Va., located south of the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, which has boomed even in the downturn. Nearly three-fourths of the top 100 outer suburban areas also saw slower growth compared with 2010, hurt by $3-a-gallon gasoline last year that has since climbed higher.

Translation: growth on the metropolitan fringes slowed in 2010. This doesn’t mean that suburban growth overall slowed but growth on the edges has slowed. I don’t think we should be too surprised by this: the housing market is in bad shape, gas prices are up, and the number of both residential and commercial projects in the suburbs has dropped. If the economy was good, the exurbs would be where growth tends to happen as there is available land (cheaper to build here than to redevelop existing suburban properties or tackle some small infill projects) and people would have money for transportation to job centers (whether these are edge cities or big cities).

I think the real question is whether the exurban growth picks up when the economy improves or at least if gas becomes cheaper. Even if exurban growth essentially stops today, many metropolitan regions could tolerate some more dense land use in their suburbs.