This writer’s take on how to write: work ahead of deadlines, give yourself time to think

I have heard lots of descriptions over the years from writers and academics about how to write. What works? What doesn’t? What routine you should follow? And so on. This is often in response to a question from a colleague or student who is curious about the process or is looking for advice. The answers or accounts tend to be idiosyncratic: what works for one particular person and personality. My sense is writers have to figure it out for themselves, trying some different methods and having some flexibility since conditions can be variable.

Photo by Usman Yousaf on Pexels.com

If I were asked my tips for writing, I would offer these two pieces of advice:

  1. Work ahead of deadlines. Some writers describe how deadlines inspire them to do great work at the last minute. They need to feel the pressure. I tend to have lots written way before the deadline. If I have a writing project to complete in a month, I will slowly work on it for weeks so that when that deadline is a week to a few days away, the draft is pretty complete. This takes some planning and finding time but my own experience is that it leads to better work. It is also related to #2…
  2. Give yourself time to think as you write. This is another reason I find writing at or very near a deadline does not work as well for me; it limits the time I have to think about what I am writing. Writing is thinking so if I am doing this way ahead of a deadline, the wheels are turning. There is time to explore new paths, consider sources I did not consider before, revise my argument if needed, and revise. I need the time to mull over what I am writing and writing under pressure makes that harder, not easier.

As for other factors that writers often talk about – where do you write? what mood do you need to be in? do you set aside time and give yourself word counts? do you listen to music or need silence? – I find these less important than the two points above. With plenty of lead time and mental room to think, I can write.

The (long) time it takes to develop academic arguments

One feature of summer and breaks for college faculty is the possibility of more time for writing and working on projects. While this writing time does not always happen given other responsibilities in life, time is needed to develop academic projects. And we may need numerous summers, breaks, and semesters to fully put together works. What do we need this time for?

Photo by SevenStorm JUHASZIMRUS on Pexels.com

-Writing and submitting proposals and grants.

-Developing ideas and precise research questions.

-Becoming familiar with the already-existing literature.

-Collecting data and evidence.

-Analysis.

-Crafting narratives that align with the research question, existing scholarly conversations, and the evidence we have.

-Writing and rewriting.

-Conversations with others.

-Presentations, whether to the public, academic groups, students, or others.

-Responding to reviewers and editors.

-Thinking (all throughout the process)

While the activities above are in a rough order from a beginning of a project to the end, it does not always work this way. These are also not necessarily discrete stages; they can blend together and are often recursive and connected as working on one part leads to going back to an earlier step or portion.

All of this means that a single writing project can easily take years. Some projects take longer than others. It can be hard to predict how long a project can take. What does this all add up to? Hopefully a coherent and compelling project.

If we added to publications and presentations a clock for the time involved, this could help reveal the time spent. Without letting such figures turn into a competition or a quest for efficiency, it could open conversations about processes and resources.

The two reasons I try to work far ahead of deadlines

I recently completed a draft of a research paper a day and a half of a deadline. I had worked on launching this paper for months and it felt good to complete it. After I met the deadline, I thought again about the process: why do I regularly work ahead of deadlines? Here are two reasons:

  1. I have more time to think. If I can start writing earlier, the writing process helps me think. Just having to write means I think about what I am saying and then having words down also pushes me to think about how the argument will continue or resolve. The time it takes to think through and develop academic arguments is underrated as I find it difficult to come up with a nicely framed argument in one sitting or at a particular moment. Even when I think I have the writing complete or have completed a section, working ahead of a deadline means I then have time to let it sit and I can consider it more clearly.
  2. You never know what might come up day to day to prevent writing, thinking, and making progress toward the deadline. This can range from things that limit thinking – a new issue that arises – to changes in the calendar or daily schedule – a person to care for, a new meeting – to who knows what. As a deadline approaches, it is hard to know what might arise, even if I have clearly blocked out time to work on a project. If I work further ahead, I can accept these changes and work around them more easily.

Would this approach work for everyone? No. It might not even have worked for me earlier as a student or as a sociologist where I had greater capacity to sit down and write a lot in one long sitting and had fewer interruptions or impediments to such sessions. Deadlines can be helpful motivators, even if some work ahead of them and others work on projects more closely to their due dates.

The four easy steps to writing a novel

Writing a novel in one month has become a popular goal: “just head over to the NaNoWriMo website and check out how many people have actually done it: More than 165,000 people participated in 2009, and more than 30,000 managed to crank out the 50,000-word goal.”

This sort of guide from Wired that reduces a novel this size to four smaller steps is actually a good reminder of the writing process. It is a common perception that writers are geniuses, able to crank out inspired complete works in one extended session. In reality, writing requires sitting down, working on small chunks, and repeatedly doing this. With this method, reaching 50,000 words isn’t actually that hard – what would be much harder would be to write those 50,000 words and then edit and re-edit everything to craft a coherent and interesting work.