One important aspect of the influential Levittowns were the houses: simple, cheap for buyers, and could be efficiently built.
The Levitts mass-produced these homes in a way that would become fairly standard among large builders. The process involved manufacturing a number of the pieces off-site and having different crews tackle each home site at different points of the home’s construction. This process differed quite a bit from the rest of the housing industry which was largely comprised of small builders who took more time with each home. While this mass process led to more uniformity (and suburban critics jumped on the architectural similarity as a metaphor for all of suburbanization), it also dramatically reduced the cost of houses. A number of initial buyers noted that they could purchase a new home in a Levittown with a cheaper monthly cost than they could rent accommodations elsewhere.
Two additional thoughts about these floor plans:
1. A fascinating aspect of these basic house models is the number of modifications made to the homes over the decades.
2. The square footage of these new homes, roughly 1,000 square feet, is unthinkable today in new homes as the average new American home is now over 2,500 square feet.
I had lung cancer surgery. The asbestos tiles may have been the cause. Do you know who made them in 1948-1951? Thank you.
LikeLike
Pingback: Jell-O and “soul-killing suburbia” | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The long-lasting consequences of the original conditions in Levittown | Legally Sociable
This is usefull thx
LikeLike
Pingback: Big drop in construction of starter homes of under 1,400 square feet | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Solving the shipping logistics of tiny houses | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Zillow sought pricing predictability in the supposedly predictable market of Phoenix | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Long Island resistance to a denser suburbia | Legally Sociable