On the heels of much discussion of residents leaving New York City, San Francisco, and other major cities because of COVID-19, the Daily Mail suggests 500,000 people have left New York City:

Photo by Craig Adderley on Pexels.com
Parts of Manhattan, famously the ‘city that never sleeps’, have begun to resemble a ghost town since 500,000 mostly wealthy and middle-class residents fled when Covid-19 struck in March.
The number is also part of the headline.
But, how do we know this number is accurate? If there was ever a figure that required some serious triangulation, this could be it. Most of the news stories I have seen on people fleeing cities rely on real estate agents and movers who have close contact with people going from one place to another. Those articles rarely mention figures, settling for vaguer pronouncements about trends or patterns. Better data could come from sources like utility companies (presumably there would be a drop in the consumption of electricity and water), the post office (how many people have changed addresses), and more systematic analyses of real estate records.
A further point about the supposed figure: even if it is accurate, it does not reveal much about long-term trends. Again, the stories on this phenomenon have hinted that some of those people who left will never return while some do want to get back. We will not know until some time has gone by after the COVID-19 pandemic slows down or disappears. Particularly for those with resources, will they sell their New York property or will they sit on it for a while to give themselves options or in order to make sure they get a decent return on it? This may be a shocking figure now but it could turn out in a year or two to mean very little if many of those same people return to the city.
In other words, I would wait to see if this number is trustworthy and if so, what exactly it means in the future. As sociologist Joel Best cautions around numbers that seem shocking, it helps to ask good questions about where the data comes from, how accurate it is, and what it means.
Pingback: The US needs the Census in order to keep up with societal change | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Poor Census response rate in neighborhoods with fleeing New Yorkers | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Does new housing data support the claim that people are leaving cities? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: During COVID-19, wealthier people now less mobile than poorer people | Legally Sociable
Pingback: New and existing home sales up but… | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Collect better data on whether Chicagoans are leaving the city | Legally Sociable
Pingback: “Zoom towns” better have good Internet capabilities | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Survey data on wealthy New York City residents thinking about leaving the city | Legally Sociable
Pingback: When I see “study” in a news story, I (wrongly) assume it is a peer-reviewed analysis | Legally Sociable
Pingback: How far might rent drop in Manhattan and other cities and who will benefit? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Missing any conversation about housing in the 2020 presidential campaign | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Homeownership up roughly 3% in 2020 | Legally Sociable
Pingback: How searching for houses online became sexy | Legally Sociable
Pingback: USPS address change data for COVID-19 sheds light on urban migration | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Graphic options for illustrating where Americans moved during COVID-19 | Legally Sociable
Pingback: So if Americans moved less in 2020, the stories of people moving from places specific to particular locations | Legally Sociable
Pingback: View housing – and America? – as “a country of 384 metro areas” | Legally Sociable