A New York City architecture firm recently designed a home intended to be “a rejoinder to the McMansion.” However, the new home is itself unusual:
Instead of building today’s typical “McMansion” of several thousand square feet, a single house of 918 ft2 is placed in the center of the site. A compressed form intersected by three spherical voids, the house has a kitchen at its center and is realized as one large room on three levels.
Instead of fossil fuel, the house is heated geothermally.
Instead of grid power, the house has electricity from the sun.
Two pictures help provide a sense of the home’s uniqueness:
I still contend that more Americans would choose the McMansion over the modernist design. Even with the McMansion’s complicated to garish architecture, it reminds more people of home. In contrast, the modernist designs seem clean but foreign, interesting but unwelcoming.
Interestingly, even the architecture firm seems to think this design is a ways from reaching the masses:
To gradually form an architecture / sculpture landscape as a nonprofit extension of “T” Space art gallery in Rhinebeck
At this point, it has a different purpose.
8 thoughts on “Would homeowners prefer a McMansion or a home with quirky angles?”
Pingback: Architecture based comedy: “McMansions have taken all of the Australianness out of the burbs” | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Thoughts on “The rise of the McModern” McMansion | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Black Mirror portrays a future in sleek, modernist structures | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Open floor plan, hide the kitchen mess | Legally Sociable
Pingback: People can live in modernist glass houses…if they have 6 acres in the woods | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Would suburban neighbors rather live next to a McMansion or a home made from shipping containers? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Maybe modernist houses will appeal to millennials – in certain circumstances | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The most McMansiony residence on Modern Family | Legally Sociable