Is a large net-zero home no longer a McMansion?

Here is another possible defense for building a McMansion: just make it a net-zero home!

Blog readers in the construction market — and anyone interested in sustainability — should read up on the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s net-zero test house in Gaithersburg, Md.

The 2,700-square-foot home (plus 1,500 square feet of unfinished basement) looks like a lot of the suburban McMansions built in the United States in the 1990s.

But this house is different. Thanks to state-of-the-art insulation and building products, plus a variety of solar panels, experts expect the home will produce as much energy as a family of four consumes over the course of a year…

According to Emily Badger’s story in The Atlantic (“This House Consumes Less Net Energy Than Your Little Urban Studio”), the home cost $2.5 million, although it could probably be duplicated in a suburban neighborhood for $600,000 to $800,000 — not counting the cost of the lot.

One critique of McMansions is that they consume too much energy. However, making a large house net-zero energy still leaves these possible McMansion traits:

1. It is still in a suburban neighborhood that probably requires lots of driving. Perhaps you have to buy an electric car to go with the house…

2. The house could still be considered too big; how much space does a household require?

3. Does having a net-zero home mean that suburban neighbors will suddenly start talking to each other and participate in civic organizations?

4. The house is still expensive and meant to impress people from the street.

But perhaps being a net-zero home magically blinds people from all of its other traits?

13 thoughts on “Is a large net-zero home no longer a McMansion?

  1. Pingback: Keeping chickens at McMansions | Legally Sociable

  2. Pingback: Linking environmental degradation and McMansions | Legally Sociable

  3. Pingback: “Net Zero” Properties: Marketing Morality – Enterprise JM

  4. Pingback: “Net Zero” Homes: Marketing Morality

  5. Pingback: “Net Zero” Houses: Marketing and advertising Morality – NORDchinaz

  6. Pingback: “Net Zero” Homes: Advertising and marketing Morality – PayperJPEG

  7. Pingback: “Net Zero” Residences: Internet marketing Morality – Fujairah Buildex

  8. Pingback: “Net Zero” Houses: Promoting Morality – Tricia Oak

  9. Pingback: The hazards of hype in a real estate boom – Luxe News

  10. Pingback: Column: The hazards of hype in a real estate boom - Office Setup

  11. Pingback: Column: The hazards of hype in a real estate boom – Wealth Creation Investing

  12. Pingback: Column: The hazards of hype in a real estate boom – The Market Genie

  13. Pingback: Column: The hazards of hype in a real estate boom – American Wealth Investing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s