Can comparative data about owning cars and homeownership in the United States help us think about how the two together help define a unique American way of life?
The data across countries suggest Americans are world leaders in owning vehicles and not so high on the list of homeownership. Few countries have more vehicles than us but over forty have higher percentages of homeownership. Yet, put these two features of life together – driving and owning a home – and they create something fairly unique in the United States.
To start, it is not just that Americans have a lot of vehicles: daily life and spaces are structured around these vehicles. For most Americans, getting to the places that are required for daily life – work, food, school, recreation – requires a vehicle. This is seen as normal and we have adapted in unique ways to this including developing fast food and big box stores (both could not exist in the same way unless people have their own vehicles, and often large ones at that, to operate). It does not have to be this way and indeed many other industrialized countries are not as dependent on vehicles for these daily activities.
As for homes, the availability of cars plus a desire to have a private single-family homes means that Americans are pretty spread out. This way of life reaches its apex in the American suburbs, which range from denser communities where driving involves shorter distances to places on the metropolitan edges where significant driving is needed for every major activity. This suburban form already existed to some degree before cars with the help of trains and streetcars. But, the availability of cars to the public in the 1920s really helped boost suburbanization as did subsequent decisions by different bodies of governments and others to promote an automobile-based society.
Critics of this way of life are plentiful even as we are nearing one hundred years of this arrangement. For more than a third of the existence of the United States, the goal of many is to own a vehicle and a home. To change this would require significant adjustments in a variety of areas. Imagine an America with smaller car companies (think of everything from the economic ripples to what commercials would replace auto ads on TV) or fewer fast food restaurants or no new sprawling suburban developments. We can see the resiliency of car and home narrative still: even as fewer than two-thirds of Americans own their dwelling (with more recent drops after the fallout of the housing bubble plus rising housing costs in certain places), it is still the goal of majority of residents (including younger Americans) and is said to be worth aspiring to. When the economy picks up, it seems Americans return to purchasing cars and homes.
Either cars or homeownership separately may not be enough to mark a unique American lifestyle. Put them together and they shape an entire society of over 300 million people.
Pingback: Construction, ride-sharing doom Chicago parking lots | Legally Sociable
Pingback: What if Americans like the suburbs? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: What could kill the McMansion, SUV, and suburban way of life: $10 a gallon gas | Legally Sociable
Pingback: When sidewalks and paths are in bad shape | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Fighting smog not by reducing driving but by insisting on more efficient cars | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Why Americans love suburbs #5: cars and driving | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Ads showing giving a new car as a Christmas gift | Legally Sociable
Pingback: A call for the Green New Deal to address sprawl and where people live | Legally Sociable
Pingback: When the landlord for a single-family home is an institutional investor… | Legally Sociable
Pingback: #1 payment priority for Americans: car loan | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Consequences of an auto loan bubble | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Viewing city-to-city trains as public goods and not profit generators | Legally Sociable
Pingback: What I want to know: do TV shows push viewers to buy certain kinds of houses? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Two data points in transportation change: NYC subway ridership peaks in 1946, US non-commuter rail traffic drops after 1945 | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Linking nicer cars to a suburb on the rise | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Many Americans can’t afford a McMansion (even if they might aspire to one) | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Suggestion that tiny houses face snobbish responses because of links to lower classes | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Fast food locations as the great American gathering places | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Get creative and sell home and new car together as package deal | Legally Sociable
Pingback: American laws privileging driving, zoning, and differential effects | Legally Sociable
Pingback: At least 12 reasons Americans have the biggest houses in the world | Legally Sociable
Pingback: A country of roving electric car fleets | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Mapping vehicle emissions in the Chicago metropolitan region | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Collectively addressing traffic rather than individual drivers looking for the best route for them | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Eleven years in, self-driving cars are still a ways off | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Twenty-first century American life: McMansions, SUVs, and celebrities | Legally Sociable
Pingback: A nation beholden to cars: a record number of pedestrians die in US in 2019 | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Subways and individual cars during COVID-19 | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Marketing 101 example: equating pickup trucks to the American way of life | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The start to social distancing summer | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Returning to a traffic-filled world – or moving to reduce traffic in the future | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Advertising yourself through your vehicle | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Trying to make a better Walmart parking lot experience | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The rise of SUV nation(s) | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Addressing the many less-than-3-mile trips in suburban settings | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Driving less in the suburbs, a space devoted to driving | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The power of talk radio to connect with an audience | Legally Sociable
Pingback: In a land of driving, both a bifurcated housing market and car buying market | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Taxing cars by miles driven already going in two states with more moving forward | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Love and mass transit in 2021 | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Do Americans actually like to drive or do they say this because much of American life requires driving? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Misplaced nostalgia in Cars for the pre-Interstate days | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The home of the brave and the (electric F-150) pickup truck | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Blame drivers for 94% of crashes or find fault in the larger system | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Americans love driving and this impacted the work of police | Legally Sociable
Pingback: In a society devoted to driving and business, what alternatives are there to rental cars? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Focusing mass transit on those who need it or commuters | Legally Sociable
Pingback: An argument for why “cars are simply vastly superior to transit alternatives” | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Suburban voters and the French presidential election | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Can a suburban newspaper call for less driving and two long-term options for minimizing driving in suburbs | Legally Sociable