Cars, homes, and the American way of life

Can comparative data about owning cars and homeownership in the United States help us think about how the two together help define a unique American way of life?

The data across countries suggest Americans are world leaders in owning vehicles and not so high on the list of homeownership. Few countries have more vehicles than us but over forty have higher percentages of homeownership. Yet, put these two features of life together – driving and owning a home – and they create something fairly unique in the United States.

To start, it is not just that Americans have a lot of vehicles: daily life and spaces are structured around these vehicles. For most Americans, getting to the places that are required for daily life – work, food, school, recreation – requires a vehicle. This is seen as normal and we have adapted in unique ways to this including developing fast food and big box stores (both could not exist in the same way unless people have their own vehicles, and often large ones at that, to operate). It does not have to be this way and indeed many other industrialized countries are not as dependent on vehicles for these daily activities.

As for homes, the availability of cars plus a desire to have a private single-family homes means that Americans are pretty spread out. This way of life reaches its apex in the American suburbs, which range from denser communities where driving involves shorter distances to places on the metropolitan edges where significant driving is needed for every major activity. This suburban form already existed to some degree before cars with the help of trains and streetcars. But, the availability of cars to the public in the 1920s really helped boost suburbanization as did subsequent decisions by different bodies of governments and others to promote an automobile-based society.

Critics of this way of life are plentiful even as we are nearing one hundred years of this arrangement. For more than a third of the existence of the United States, the goal of many is to own a vehicle and a home. To change this would require significant adjustments in a variety of areas. Imagine an America with smaller car companies (think of everything from the economic ripples to what commercials would replace auto ads on TV) or fewer fast food restaurants or no new sprawling suburban developments. We can see the resiliency of car and home narrative still: even as fewer than two-thirds of Americans own their dwelling (with more recent drops after the fallout of the housing bubble plus rising housing costs in certain places), it is still the goal of majority of residents (including younger Americans) and is said to be worth aspiring to. When the economy picks up, it seems Americans return to purchasing cars and homes.

Either cars or homeownership separately may not be enough to mark a unique American lifestyle. Put them together and they shape an entire society of over 300 million people.

24 thoughts on “Cars, homes, and the American way of life

  1. Pingback: Construction, ride-sharing doom Chicago parking lots | Legally Sociable

  2. Pingback: What if Americans like the suburbs? | Legally Sociable

  3. Pingback: What could kill the McMansion, SUV, and suburban way of life: $10 a gallon gas | Legally Sociable

  4. Pingback: When sidewalks and paths are in bad shape | Legally Sociable

  5. Pingback: Fighting smog not by reducing driving but by insisting on more efficient cars | Legally Sociable

  6. Pingback: Why Americans love suburbs #5: cars and driving | Legally Sociable

  7. Pingback: Ads showing giving a new car as a Christmas gift | Legally Sociable

  8. Pingback: A call for the Green New Deal to address sprawl and where people live | Legally Sociable

  9. Pingback: When the landlord for a single-family home is an institutional investor… | Legally Sociable

  10. Pingback: #1 payment priority for Americans: car loan | Legally Sociable

  11. Pingback: Consequences of an auto loan bubble | Legally Sociable

  12. Pingback: Viewing city-to-city trains as public goods and not profit generators | Legally Sociable

  13. Pingback: What I want to know: do TV shows push viewers to buy certain kinds of houses? | Legally Sociable

  14. Pingback: Two data points in transportation change: NYC subway ridership peaks in 1946, US non-commuter rail traffic drops after 1945 | Legally Sociable

  15. Pingback: Linking nicer cars to a suburb on the rise | Legally Sociable

  16. Pingback: Many Americans can’t afford a McMansion (even if they might aspire to one) | Legally Sociable

  17. Pingback: Suggestion that tiny houses face snobbish responses because of links to lower classes | Legally Sociable

  18. Pingback: Fast food locations as the great American gathering places | Legally Sociable

  19. Pingback: Get creative and sell home and new car together as package deal | Legally Sociable

  20. Pingback: American laws privileging driving, zoning, and differential effects | Legally Sociable

  21. Pingback: At least 12 reasons Americans have the biggest houses in the world | Legally Sociable

  22. Pingback: A country of roving electric car fleets | Legally Sociable

  23. Pingback: Mapping vehicle emissions in the Chicago metropolitan region | Legally Sociable

  24. Pingback: Collectively addressing traffic rather than individual drivers looking for the best route for them | Legally Sociable

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s