Americans will go to some lengths to keep their lawn green – including painting it.
As the worst drought in decades hits two-thirds of the USA, residents and businesses in normally well-watered areas are catching on to the lawn-painting practice employed for years in the drier West and Southwest…
Perazzo said the dyed lawns will hold their look for a few months…
In the frequently parched Phoenix area, Brian Howland said he started Arizona Lawn Painting after the nationwide foreclosure crisis left scores of homes empty and their lawns neglected.
Some customers have been residents fearful that their homeowners’ associations will penalize them for letting their lawns fade.
This is either an example of American ingenuity, fear of homeowner’s associations, or a strange quest to maintain face/status as a homeowner.
I would love to know if neighbors look down on their neighbors who have to dye their lawn. In other words, how much status can one recover through this method? Another way to think about this would be to look at whether homes on the real estate market with dyed lawns do better or worse in terms of time on the market and sales price. The best thing that can come out of dyeing seems to be that those unfamiliar with the lawn and neighborhood might not know any better.
Pingback: Painting the lawn has adverse effects on photosynthesis | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Don’t paint your lawn green; use a microsphere colorant! | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Drought leads to more lawn spray-painting, lawn removal in California | Legally Sociable
Pingback: What you can make from giving up your lawn in the West | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The number of dandelions in the yard as an indicator of social class | Legally Sociable