The drought shaming continues in California. First, CBS highlights some of the biggest water wasters in the Bay Area:
The district released the names and consumption in response to a public records request by the San Jose Mercury News and other media outlets covering the drought.
Beane released a statement through the Oakland A’s.
“Three irrigation leaks were recently discovered and corrected. We were more than displeased and embarrassed by the usage,” Beane said.
Retired Chevron Oil executive George Kirkland tops the list by using more than 12,000 gallons of water a day – 48 times the district average. He also pointed to previously undetected seepage.
Here is an older gallery where CBS highlights the greenery outside the homes of numerous celebrities. This link includes a picture and this text:
Despite the sweeping water regulations imposed by California state officials this spring, Jenny’s “block” remains green.
And though the state has only issued eight $100 fines and two $200 fines to water wasters up until this point, Lopez may soon face a much heftier fine if she wants to keep her lawn this way.
Gov. Jerry Brown is calling for legislators to enforce fines of up to $10,000 for residents and businesses that waste the most water, as California cities struggle to meet mandatory conservation targets.
I imagine reporting to the public about leaders and celebrities can be quite effective in reducing the water usage. Few famous people want to be seen as wasters of natural resources when others are sacrificing. (I suspect this would be quite different if there wasn’t much of a drought or if the owners could claim commercial revenues or jobs on these properties – this is what the Las Vegas casinos do.) Even the higher proposed fines, $10,000, wouldn’t matter much to some people. While the shaming might be more effective (reducing water usage and helping politicians look like they are standing up for the interests of everyone), couldn’t the state also use the money? If celebrities wanted to pay big fines, wouldn’t this help balance some budgets?
Pingback: Perfect lawns and suburbanization | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Rethinking the largest American crop: the lawn | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Now that the dandelions are almost gone, how lawn owners of different social classes can set themselves apart | Legally Sociable
Pingback: How many mega-celebrities live in older homes? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Will there be more lawn mowing or less lawn mowing with climate change? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Have a more expensive house, keep the lawn greener with automatic sprinklers | Legally Sociable