Xmas gifts: America has socialized mortgages, free market health care

The preface to Shaky Ground: The Strange Saga of the U.S. Mortgage Giants includes this fascinating section:

The big banks have at least superficially paid back the money the government gave them; General Motors and Chrysler are out of bankruptcy; but Fannie and Freddie are still in conservatorship. Even more significant, most of the mortgage market in this country is now supported by government agencies, more so that it was before the financial crisis. The former governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, told me this: “Most countries have socialized health care and a free market for mortgages. You in the United States do exactly the opposite.”

Americans of all political stripes have long supported the idea that residents deserve to own a home. This is reflected in government policy, as Bethany McLean argues, where politicians suggest they want Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac out of the mortgage business yet let them become a more and more integral part of the process.

It would be interesting to know how the money poured into the GSEs might be used elsewhere to support other things Americans like to have.

31 thoughts on “Xmas gifts: America has socialized mortgages, free market health care

  1. Pingback: The middle class finding it difficult to find city housing – what to do? | Legally Sociable

  2. Pingback: Home builders pull support of tax cuts over mortgage interest deduction | Legally Sociable

  3. Pingback: Eight (unlikely and unpopular) policy options for addressing housing issues | Legally Sociable

  4. Pingback: Don’t forget that American residents can collectively help decide what houses mean for Americans | Legally Sociable

  5. Pingback: Understanding homeownership in the United States through comparative data | Legally Sociable

  6. Pingback: What if Americans like the suburbs? | Legally Sociable

  7. Pingback: What could kill the McMansion, SUV, and suburban way of life: $10 a gallon gas | Legally Sociable

  8. Pingback: A lottery for limited affordable housing housing, part one | Legally Sociable

  9. Pingback: Why I’m skeptical housing will become a national political issue | Legally Sociable

  10. Pingback: Production housing in the suburbs and what Americans want out of homes | Legally Sociable

  11. Pingback: Quick Review: No Place Like Home: Wealth, Community & the Politics of Homeownership | Legally Sociable

  12. Pingback: Why Americans love suburbs #1: single-family homes | Legally Sociable

  13. Pingback: Americans are conditioned and enabled to buy large homes | Legally Sociable

  14. Pingback: If “Ninety percent or so of renters still want to become homeowners,” what could this lead to? | Legally Sociable

  15. Pingback: Linking Microsoft giving $500 million for Seattle area housing to tech companies and declining gov’t support for housing | Legally Sociable

  16. Pingback: Resist the social engineering of mass transit but ignore the social engineering of suburbia | Legally Sociable

  17. Pingback: The urban theory behind SimCity | Legally Sociable

  18. Pingback: When the landlord for a single-family home is an institutional investor… | Legally Sociable

  19. Pingback: 1960s white religious leaders: God told us to love our neighbors but did not mean to pick our neighbors for us | Legally Sociable

  20. Pingback: The suburban way of life is not the result of free markets | Legally Sociable

  21. Pingback: Coldwell Banker’s map of Chicago area locations missing parts of Chicago | Legally Sociable

  22. Pingback: Housing as the ultimate marker of poorly functioning (free) markets | Legally Sociable

  23. Pingback: Which 2020 candidate will set themselves apart by promoting homeownership? | Legally Sociable

  24. Pingback: At least 12 reasons Americans have the biggest houses in the world | Legally Sociable

  25. Pingback: Reminder: “Americans have no comparable safety net for housing” | Legally Sociable

  26. Pingback: Housing for tenants, housing for landlords? | Legally Sociable

  27. Pingback: The importance and consequences of separating single-family homes from other land uses in the United States | Legally Sociable

  28. Pingback: Looking to global examples to address housing crunches in expensive cities | Legally Sociable

  29. Pingback: 29 years on a waiting list to access a housing voucher in Chicago | Legally Sociable

  30. Pingback: Compared to homeowners, renters stay in a residence for a shorter time | Legally Sociable

  31. Pingback: Argument: increase the value of federally-backed mortgages, finance more McMansions | Legally Sociable

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s