The big banks have at least superficially paid back the money the government gave them; General Motors and Chrysler are out of bankruptcy; but Fannie and Freddie are still in conservatorship. Even more significant, most of the mortgage market in this country is now supported by government agencies, more so that it was before the financial crisis. The former governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, told me this: “Most countries have socialized health care and a free market for mortgages. You in the United States do exactly the opposite.”
Americans of all political stripes have long supported the idea that residents deserve to own a home. This is reflected in government policy, as Bethany McLean argues, where politicians suggest they want Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac out of the mortgage business yet let them become a more and more integral part of the process.
It would be interesting to know how the money poured into the GSEs might be used elsewhere to support other things Americans like to have.
Pingback: The middle class finding it difficult to find city housing – what to do? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Home builders pull support of tax cuts over mortgage interest deduction | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Eight (unlikely and unpopular) policy options for addressing housing issues | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Don’t forget that American residents can collectively help decide what houses mean for Americans | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Understanding homeownership in the United States through comparative data | Legally Sociable
Pingback: What if Americans like the suburbs? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: What could kill the McMansion, SUV, and suburban way of life: $10 a gallon gas | Legally Sociable
Pingback: A lottery for limited affordable housing housing, part one | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Why I’m skeptical housing will become a national political issue | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Production housing in the suburbs and what Americans want out of homes | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Quick Review: No Place Like Home: Wealth, Community & the Politics of Homeownership | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Why Americans love suburbs #1: single-family homes | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Americans are conditioned and enabled to buy large homes | Legally Sociable
Pingback: If “Ninety percent or so of renters still want to become homeowners,” what could this lead to? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Linking Microsoft giving $500 million for Seattle area housing to tech companies and declining gov’t support for housing | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Resist the social engineering of mass transit but ignore the social engineering of suburbia | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The urban theory behind SimCity | Legally Sociable
Pingback: When the landlord for a single-family home is an institutional investor… | Legally Sociable
Pingback: 1960s white religious leaders: God told us to love our neighbors but did not mean to pick our neighbors for us | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The suburban way of life is not the result of free markets | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Coldwell Banker’s map of Chicago area locations missing parts of Chicago | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Housing as the ultimate marker of poorly functioning (free) markets | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Which 2020 candidate will set themselves apart by promoting homeownership? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: At least 12 reasons Americans have the biggest houses in the world | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Reminder: “Americans have no comparable safety net for housing” | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Housing for tenants, housing for landlords? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The importance and consequences of separating single-family homes from other land uses in the United States | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Looking to global examples to address housing crunches in expensive cities | Legally Sociable
Pingback: 29 years on a waiting list to access a housing voucher in Chicago | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Compared to homeowners, renters stay in a residence for a shorter time | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Argument: increase the value of federally-backed mortgages, finance more McMansions | Legally Sociable