If more Americans are interested in tiny houses, what steps might be needed for them to become viable options for more people?
Experts say the movement’s main goal this year should be to convince more states and municipalities to legalize tiny houses across the country…
Some leaders in the movement hope to end the narrative that tiny houses are for families…
Tiny houses also need to be seen as viable affordable housing in the future, experts say…
Some of the leaders of the tiny-house movement said they hope to distance themselves from the rise in RVs and camper vans this year
It is interesting to see these four strategies together. Based on this article and previous articles I have seen claiming tiny houses are trending up, I have not seen enough evidence that there is a sizable shift toward tiny houses.
But, perhaps those who claim these four strategies are necessary would say that each point addresses something that holds the tiny house movement back. I would put these four into two broader categories that are worth exploring more.
The first category has to do with important local zoning regulations. Communities are prepared to handle single-family homes and many would be prepared to address multi-family housing. But, tiny houses are out of the ordinary and present unique challenges and opportunities. Should they be allowed on the same lot as an existing home? Do they go with micro-lots? Do they threaten the character of single-family homes? How many could be put on a regular residential plot of land? What are their water and services needs? Are these going to be cheaper or more luxury tiny homes? It would take some time to figure this out in many communities.
The second category involves the next three points. These are marketing and perception issues. Who are tiny houses for? What are they about? What social needs do they serve? The three points above try to answer these questions: tiny houses are for smaller households, they could be affordable housing, but they are not like RVs and camper vans. This puts them into an in-between category: not as permanent as a single-family house but not as mobile as an RV or camper van; cheaper than a typical house but there is still a cost (plus possible land costs); for some people but not others. Perhaps growing more quickly within a particular niche is what would help tiny houses as a whole become more popular.
There could be additional issues to address. If many more Americans wanted to order a tiny house in the next few weeks, could the orders be fulfilled relatively quickly? Do we have sufficient public and private spaces around tiny homes so that people can enjoy living in such a small space?
This is a lot to do. That can be okay; not all products have explosive growth and slow positive change could work out in the long run.
One thought on “Steps for growing the tiny house movement in 2021”
Pingback: Tiny homes for vacations – but for full-time living? | Legally Sociable