Category Archives: Sociology

Pedestrian deaths in US hit record, continue to rise

Posted on by

Keep safe, American pedestrians:

Photo by Ketut Subiyanto on Pexels.com

More than 7,500 people were killed last year after being struck by vehicles while walking along or across U.S. roadways — the most pedestrian deaths in more than four decades, according to a new report.

This sobering trend was not surprising to experts who track the numbers. But they were dismayed by the consistent increase — up 77% since 2010.

The article goes on to suggest multiple possible reasons for the increase. In a society that privileges driving, pedestrians need to exercise caution.

From a social problems perspective, at what point would pedestrian deaths become a sufficient issue that people and governments would devote significant resources to addressing it? I am trying to imagine a pedestrian lobby that brings together different groups and it is hard to envision such a movement coming together. Perhaps it requires major marches on population centers? Could local walkers or walking groups join together with park districts, outdoor companies, and others with a stake in pedestrian activity to collectively act? The ability to walk safely should be prioritized, but it is not the primary concern in transportation or with roadways.

(Additionally, American roadways are not safe for drivers either. According to one source, “The United States has the most traffic deaths per capita of any developed country.”)

Hoping to revive shopping malls with pickleball

Posted on by

Could indoor pickleball courts save a depressed shopping mall near you?

Photo by Mason Tuttle on Pexels.com

The game, a mixture of tennis, badminton and pingpong, is the fastest-growing sport in America, but it requires a large court and finding space to play has become a problem.

Enter Pickleball America, which is building an 80,000-square-foot pickleball court in what used to be a two-story Saks OFF 5th at the Stamford Town Center in Connecticut.

The group is also looking at transforming other retail spaces in New Hampshire and New Jersey.

The idea seems a perfect marriage for a sport that needs massive spaces and a dying form of retail business replaced by online shopping...

“The mall just needed little bit of a boost, so with the idea of the space, it was a perfect fit,” said Pickleball America co-owner Jay Waldner of the 28-court Stamford facility. Waldner also said pickleball at the mall could annually attract 500,000 players, who could also shop during their visits.

Come play a game of pickleball and then stick around the mall for a bite, entertainment, and then a return to a nearby residence. Shopping may or may not be part of a regular trip.

I assume this new pickleball space is a for-profit enterprise. Do Americans want to pay to play pickleball or would they prefer local park districts pick up the bill for these courts? Is the indoor court enough to entice people to play? Residents may prefer that pickleball noise is contained to an indoor space at a shopping mall.

Which shopping malls could support a large pickleball facility? It is not a surprise to see this attempted in wealthier suburban communities.

Why not let every Chicago suburb pitch the Chicago Bears on a stadium deal?

Posted on by

The Chicago area has several hundred suburbs. Why not have dozens of them submit proposals to the Chicago Bears for a stadium and surrounding development? If the goal is to get the most tax breaks and make the most money, this is how Amazon and other large firms operate.

Here is one satirical look at some options:

Winnetka

Cheap Uber rides to the stadium for the McCaskeys from their North Shore abodes. Every dollar saved counts…

Blue Island

A local referendum changing the town’s name to “Black and Blue Island” could seal the deal. Fans would travel from remote parking lots to the stadium via a scenic barge ride on the Little Calumet River…

Batavia

In conjunction with nearby Fermilab, America’s particle physics and accelerator laboratory, the Bears could find the answers to two of life’s eternal questions: How did the universe begin? and Why can’t the Bears win another Super Bowl?…

Downers Grove

The Bears already have been a downer for many years. Just make it official by building a retractable DownersDome.

The Chicago area is large and there are plenty of possible sites for a stadium. And for most fans, the view of the game on TV will look the same regardless of where the stadium is located.

What it might mean to have a house sticker on the back window of my car

Posted on by

Stickers on the back windows of cars can signal all sorts of things. The number of family members. A favorite vacation spot. A beloved car brand or sports team.

What would a house sticker in the back window mean?

I recently saw a SUV with a two-story house sticker. The sticker looks similar to a drawing a child might make of a house. The picture below has such an image; this sticker had much cleaner lines but had a similar shape.

Photo by Maria Mileta on Pexels.com

Here are some options for what the driver of the vehicle might want others to know:

  1. They own a home. Americans value home ownership.
  2. They value home. Like others might include stickers of family members and pets, this house signals the importance of home and what happens there.
  3. They work in real estate or a related industry. However, wouldn’t they want to put their name or company to make this clear?
  4. Someone in their household or a friend drew this picture and they made a sticker out of it. It is easy to order stickers online.

Put together a home and an SUV (with a sticker of a home) and you have the American Dream?

In defining a McMansion, does Quicken Loans want people to buy one or not?

Posted on by

The website for Quicken Loans features an article defining a McMansion. Here is the definition:

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

A McMansion is a large, highly ornate house often found in planned communities. This term is sometimes used as a criticism of mass-produced homes that don’t follow strict architectural styles.

They are large homes on small plots of land and can be more prevalent in states like California, New York and Texas. McMansions provide a way for upper-middle-class Americans to inflate their economic status.

McMansions are often generic and made from low-quality materials, so they don’t hold up well over time.

You can compare this definition to my four traits of McMansions.

Here is the “bottom line” in the article:

McMansions get a bad rap and are often referred to in a disapproving manner, but there are advantages to purchasing one. It can be a good way to buy a larger home, and you may be able to live in a nicer neighborhood. However, these houses may also come with high property taxes and can be expensive to maintain, especially if they’re built with low-quality materials.

For a company interested in providing mortgages, does this encourage people to pursue McMansions or not? I suppose providing information is helpful. I imagine all the major mortgage companies have underwritten lots of McMansion mortgages and would like to do more.

If a Quicken Loans customer does not like a McMansion but wants a bigger home that is not a mansion, what kind of home should they go after instead?

Potentially different logics for land: from a church that “nourished thousands” to million dollar homes

Posted on by

Reflecting on the tearing down of a Catholic church in Chicago, one long-time parishioner describes what will replace the structure:

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

It’s a “good’ neighborhood now. And the land that Transfiguration once occupied will be turned into about a dozen single-family homes, where, in an area that was zoned for and still is largely home to two- and three-flats, the starting price of a new house is $1.35 million. Talk to me about the zoning on that one.

This week is the one I dreaded: the physical building, Transfiguration of Our Lord, is being torn down. I held out hope that the building that had welcomed and taken care of so many would be preserved. At the very least, I hoped that the land that nourished thousands of families would house a few more of them in the middle of a nationwide affordable housing crisis. But why build homes for two or three families when you can get rich selling a house to just one?

So the fences have gone up, and the building is coming down.

Processing the closing of a long-time religious congregation can be difficult.

But, there is also a suggestion above that these are two very different uses of land. According to this member, the church nourished families and the community. The church welcomed immigrants. Its school educated kids. The church was a gathering place. Churches in the United States do not pay property taxes, but they can provide services for the neighborhood.

In contrast, the buildings that will replace the church will be expensive single-family homes. These will provide private space for households within a desirable neighborhood. There is money to be made in the developing and selling of the buildings.

This could lead to a question: is land better used for organizations that serve the community or for single-family homes? If people care more about money, creating more real estate is the answer. If people want to emphasize community, there might be room for religious congregations and other neighborhood organizations, but they may need to sustain themselves. Americans value single-family homes and like making money. When congregations close, it is a relatively easy step in many communities to redevelop this land or reuse the buildings in ways that generate money and revenue.

Responding to the affordability of suburbs outside America’s most expensive cities

Posted on by

A recent analysis looked at how affordable suburban residences were compared to prices in the most expensive cities in the U.S.:

Photo by Curtis Adams on Pexels.com

Buying a house in the suburbs isn’t just a little easier on the wallet for city dwellers. In some parts of the country, bedroom communities offer an entirely different real estate market. Over 600 of the 777 suburbs within 30 miles of the country’s 20 most expensive cities are more affordable in terms of price per square foot — up to 65% cheaper in some places.

The East Coast offers the most suburban alternatives to main cities: 95 of the top 100 suburbs with the biggest price differences are near New York, Washington D.C., Boston, and Miami…

These are the top 10 cities with the most relatively affordable suburbs for home buyers, ranked by the percentage of suburbs with a lower cost per square foot compared to the main city.

  1. Salt Lake City, Utah (100%)
  2. New York, New York (98%)
  3. Washington, D.C. (97%)
  4. Boston, Massachusetts (93%)
  5. Honolulu, Hawaii (90%)
  6. Austin, Texas (89%)
  7. Seattle, Washington (83%)
  8. Boise, Idaho (80%)
  9. Denver, Colorado (80%)
  10. Riverside, California (79%)

A few thoughts in response:

  1. Do people always seek out the cheapest housing and move to the suburbs? Some will move to the suburbs because of lower price points. Others might stay in the city or go to the suburbs for other reasons.
  2. Is 30 miles out from an expensive city a large enough radius? It might be for some of these cities and not for others. Additionally, many commutes are suburb to suburb to being 40 miles out and commuting to a suburb 25 miles from the city is a different comparison than city versus suburban settings.
  3. One reason the expensive cities are so pricey is that they are desirable. If more people move to a region, does this then decrease the affordability of suburbs as well?
  4. Is it safe to assume then that there are metro areas where city and suburb prices do not have much difference?

Will a new Bewitched TV show be set in a similar looking suburbia?

Posted on by

A new Bewitched show is in the works:

Photo by Burak The Weekender on Pexels.com

The Bewitched update would focus on Tabitha Stevens, the 13-year-old daughter of witch Samantha and human Darrin. She juggles two lives attending middle school while also being secretly enrolled in a magical academy run by her grandmother, Endora — D’Ambrosia describes the premise as “Hannah Montana meets Harry Potter.”

The only mention of the setting of the show involves school settings: a middle school and a magical academy. The original Bewitched, a very popular show in the 1960s, was set in the suburbs of New York City. Samantha stayed at home while Darrin worked in the city. They live in a single-family home. They had a nosy neighbor. They have children.

Will the new Bewitched also include any of suburbia or will it primarily focus on schools? Interestingly, the two comparison TV shows mentioned above also include suburban settings. Hannah Montana was primarily set in Malibu, California while Harry Potter included scenes in and around the Dursley’s house on Privet Drive.

If the new version does include the suburbs, there is an opportunity for the suburbia depicted to look quite different than that of the 1960s. The suburbia often depicted on television then often portrayed nuclear family life in single-family homes on quiet streets. The suburbs today are more complex, diverse, and varied. There is an opportunity here to depict not only updated characters and storylines but also settings.

A common suburban sentiment about land uses: “But I don’t want to live anywhere near it”

Posted on by

An Arlington Heights resident describes the reasons he does not want a Chicago Bears stadium near where he lives:

Photo by SHVETS production on Pexels.com

The McCaskey family is in love with Arlington Heights? Well, me, too. I pay every nickel in property taxes I owe and am quite happy with the services I receive in return. I suggest Da Bears be required to do the same. In addition, they can build the infrastructure required at their own expense. With the full oversight and approval of the village of Arlington Heights, of course. If this is unacceptable, then please, by all means, head to Naperville. Best of luck to all…

The McCaskey family will plop a 70,000-seat domed stadium, plus sportsbook (that’s a casino, folks) on a portion of the property and sell off pieces to the highest bidders who will quickly turn the place into a national party destination. And it won’t just be eight Sundays a year. I’m quite certain they envision March Madness, Super Bowls and Taylor Swift concerts. Trains will back up through downtown; Euclid Avenue, Wilke Road and Northwest Highway will be jammed; and our perfect little town will be overrun.

“Don’t be ridiculous,” I can hear them say. “All stadium traffic will be routed to the expressways.” Uh-huh. Ever been to Wrigley Field? I have. What a cool place. What a legendary sports destination. But I don’t want to live anywhere near it. Nor do I want to live next door to the Airbnb rental on the weekend the Packers are in town.

What if the Bears back out? What will we do with a 326-acre lot? Here are some ideas: walking, running and biking paths. Lakes and paddleboats. Horseback riding would be a nice touch. Skate parks for the skateboarders in the summer, a wandering ice-skating path in the winter with a warming house. A nine-hole golf course — walking only, kids-only.

I’m sure the numbers are daunting, but why not be creative? Not every use of land has to be about growth, development and profitability. We are rushing into the arms of the first suitor that has presented us with a ring. I suggest we get it appraised. It feels like cubic zirconium to me.

On one hand, this is a specific response to a particular proposed land use. A major stadium plus surrounding development is a big deal. In mature suburbs where big pieces of land become available only rarely, decisions about this land can be very consequential. Additionally, residents of suburbs often feel they should have a say in how land in their community is used. This is one of the reasons they like living in suburbs: they are closer to local government officials and processes. After all, they pay taxes, they live in the community, and they will be affected by the new development.

On the other hand, the sentiment of “not wanting to live anywhere near it” is a common one across suburbs. This could refer to affordable housing or waste transfer stations or drug treatment facilities or religious buildings or other uses suburbanites feel will threaten their way of life. Residents may not like the idea that growth is good yet this part of the appeal of many suburbs where growth signals continued residential and business demand.

The Chicago Bears will end up somewhere and there will likely be some residents who do not like the decision to have a stadium near them. Given the billions of dollars and status at stake here, they might not be able to do much about it.

Finding the closest road named after Secretariat among the varied road names of suburbia

Posted on by

I recently had a reason to drive by the nearest roadway named after Secretariat:

This is a short roadway. True to being a “court,” it is a cul-de-sac with roughly seven houses along it. According to Google Maps, it is about 250 feet long.

When I wrote about this one month ago, I had this road in mind. Did the name transform the surroundings and/or elevate the late 1980s suburban neighborhood due to the prestigious athlete? Not particularly. Is it a unique name? Yes, but one shared by over 200 other locations in the United States.

Perhaps the biggest difference between this specific street and those nearby is that it is a recognizable or more unique name. For example, here are some of the more anonymous streets within a mile or so in sprawling suburbia: George Street, Jeffrey Court, Hamilton Drive, Rose Court, and Christina Circle. These might be named after specific people but it is hard to know decades later.

Secretariat lives on in this suburb in a way that LeBron James or Tom Brady or other people in the running for the best in their sports probably never will.