The book Cubedtackles what has become a ubiquitous space in today’s America: the white-collar office. Here are some thoughts about the book:
1. While the book might appear at first glance to be about office spaces, it is largely about the development and evolution of white-collar workers in the United States. This shift from farming and manufacturing in the late 1800s to office and clerical work was a profound shift in American society that affected everything from women in the workplace to educational aspirations to what it means to be middle class to what urban downtowns look like. It isn’t just about cubicles or desk chairs; it is about a shift toward knowledge workers increasingly laboring for big corporate America. It may seem normal now, but it is a remarkable shift over roughly 100 years.
2. While this shouldn’t be surprising given the field of architecture and design, it is still remarkable how much of office design was about trendy ideas and theories than on-the-ground information about what makes offices work. Thus, a history of American offices includes Taylorism, Le Corbusier, and Peter Drucker. Have a new idea about the intersection of work spaces and human interaction? If it is popular enough, it is likely going to going to be translated into office designs. Unfortunately, some of this theorizing comes at the expense of workers who were guinea pigs.
3. The book does well to include plenty of sociology, particularly picking up after World War II as sociologists like C. Wright Mills noticed the big shifts in society. At the same time, it strikes me that there isn’t enough well-known sociology about office life and American businesses more broadly. This may change in the near future with more economic and organizational sociology but it seems like a missed opportunity in the past from a field that focused on other topics.
4. This is the sort of book that would benefit from more pictures and architectural plans. There are some scattered throughout the book but I could easily imagine a coffee table companion book with rich photos and designs of iconic office arrangements. It can be hard at times to visualize the major patterns.
All in all, the book is a nice overview of American offices in the last 100+ years. There are numerous places where this book could have ballooned to many more pages but it doesn’t feel like the author is painting with too broad of strokes. Indeed, if we want to understand America in 2014, perhaps we should look less to Washington, glittering skylines, and the entertainment industry but rather examine what millions of Americans experience regularly in their offices.
11 thoughts on “Quick Review: Cubed”
Pingback: Google and other tech companies continue HQ architecture race | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Wide buildings ripe for use for wide-open workplaces | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Open office arrangements may not work for getting work done | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Trying to make vacant suburban office parks more attractive | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Separate places for home and work – even when you are working from home | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Open offices might be pushed out by COVID-19 | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Reconsidering the need for faculty offices after COVID-19 | Legally Sociable
Pingback: The rise and fall of the filing cabinet as critical infrastructure | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Air conditioning and a “homogenized standard of comfort” | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Discovering the “unaccounted” time at work and then designing work spaces around that | Legally Sociable
Pingback: More people working from home + smaller corporate offices = more coworking spaces? | Legally Sociable