Filling vacant suburban office parks can be hard. Here are some Chicagoland efforts to renovate these spacess:
At the former OfficeMax headquarters in Naperville, his architecture firm and developer Franklin Partners cut away portions of large trees, put in new smaller ones and strategically replanted some flower beds as part of a multimillion-dollar redevelopment to make the 350,000-square-foot property more appealing to a variety of companies…
For one, grand front desks typically found just inside the entrance of office properties built in the 1980s and 1990s no longer work. Those are being hidden and replaced by amenities that generate the most activity, like coffee bars, fitness centers and conferencing space. “It’s not unlike walking into a hotel,” says principal Roger Heerema. “There’s a feeling of life that is immediately apparent.”
Strategic use of light fixtures and canopies over entrances make a difference, he says, as does making sure tenants are actually noticing them. At the Westwood, a half-empty, two-building office complex being renovated in west suburban Lisle, the tenant lounge is located near a main visitor entrance. So Wright Heerema designed new lounges for both buildings near second entrances where most employees come and go…
In the suburbs’ corporate heyday, office buildings “were machines for working—you packed people into them,” says OKW Architects Chairman and CEO Jon Talty. “That attitude has changed profoundly. The lifeless machines need to have meaning to them to be relevant.”
How office space is designed goes through phases.
It would be interesting to hear more details about these approaches:
- How often do the changes involve asking current employees what they want as opposed to executives or designers making decisions and/or focusing on what potential employees might want?
- The argument above is that a redesign is going to attract a leasee or new employees. What exactly is the return on investment in good or cool design?
- Do companies and designers consider larger changes, such as adding more mixed uses to these campuses or opening up the buildings and spaces to reintegrate them into the surrounding area, or is the primary goal to make a quick fix to fill them with users again? In other words, is the bigger question how to move away from office parks and separate and move to a denser and more integrated suburban landscape?
- Does the design for a space work until someone moves out and then a refresh is needed? How often do companies proactively change their spaces in response to changing goals or employee needs?
Pingback: The budget gap facing Chicago area suburbs due to COVID-19 | Legally Sociable
Pingback: What redevelopment will suburbs pursue with COVID-19 induced vacancies? | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Selling Schaumburg, Illinois | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Finding housing in former strip malls and big box stores in California | Legally Sociable
Pingback: A strange housing market: limited supply, less construction, rent prices diverging from home prices… | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Sears in decline leads to another large available suburban office campus | Legally Sociable
Pingback: Pop-up COVID-19 testing sites likely benefit from more vacant commercial properties | Legally Sociable