Can American residents and leaders be convinced population stagnation or loss is not that bad?

Chicago continues to lose residents and Houston is coming up fast. A sociologist is cited as saying the population decrease is not that bad:

Christine Percheski, an associate professor of sociology at Northwestern University, cautioned that while it is significant to note that Chicago is losing people, “this does not necessarily reflect the health or the functioning of the city.”

An array of complicated factors are at play in population numbers, including changes to mortality, fertility and immigration rates, she noted.

I believe Percheski is right: the relatively small population loss in Chicago plus the city’s ability to avoid the larger population losses experienced by many Rust Belt cities means this is not a huge deal. Of course, getting passed by Houston in population will matter (though Toronto passing Chicago barely registered).

But, will residents and leaders ever be convinced that a lack of growth is not bad? Because growth is good and this argument is rarely challenged, population stagnation or loss set off an alarm bell. Why exactly this is the case is a bit harder to articulate but it likely involves a loss of status and a suggestion that the city has limited momentum heading into the future.

At this point, the United States does not have good models of cities and communities that have stalled out in population or even declined that are widely regarded as successful places. Chicago could be one of these models and perhaps it could work because it is so big and so storied. On the other hand, if Chicago has small population loss for decades, this adds up and will require Chicago leaders to work harder and harder to convince residents and businesses that the long-term story is not bad.

11 thoughts on “Can American residents and leaders be convinced population stagnation or loss is not that bad?

  1. Pingback: Leader who does not like “Mayor 1 percent” label joins Wall Street investment firm | Legally Sociable

  2. Pingback: Rethink Rezoning, Save Main responses share similar concerns – Part Two | Legally Sociable

  3. Pingback: Declining populations in the New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago regions | Legally Sociable

  4. Pingback: The nuanced reasons for population loss in Illinois | Legally Sociable

  5. Pingback: Cities and societies always at risk of declining? | Legally Sociable

  6. Pingback: The little development battles happening across American suburbs | Legally Sociable

  7. Pingback: Lamenting small town growth in Idaho | Legally Sociable

  8. Pingback: Argument: “the real civic religion of America, business at all costs” | Legally Sociable

  9. Pingback: Losing population in other Illinois cities | Legally Sociable

  10. Pingback: Census data on how Chicago would have lost more residents in the 2010s if not for international migration | Legally Sociable

  11. Pingback: Using old technology to get around twenty-first century cities | Legally Sociable

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s