Moral minimalism and addressing social issues

In the 1989 study The Moral Order of a Suburb, sociologist M. P. Baumgartner argued that suburban order rested on what she called “moral minimalism”:

A kind of moral minimalism pervades the suburbs, in which people prefer the least extreme reactions to offenses and are reluctant to exercise any social control against one another at all. (3)

In a later description of moral minimalism, she writes:

Moral minimalism entails a considerable degree of indifference to the wrongdoing of others…If people in such places cannot be bothered to take action against those who offend them or to engage in conflicts, neither can they be bothered to help those in need. (131)

Most residents do not want to involve third parties when conflict arises (unless it involves strangers) – it would be better to do nothing at all.

The pervasive moral minimalism found in the suburbs contrasts sharply with claims that American society is particularly violent or litigious. However true such characterizations may be for other settings, they do not reflect suburban reality. Residents of suburbs like Hampton rarely aggress against one another physically, and for them, law remains primarily a theoretical option for handling grievances that arise in their everyday lives. They are happy to have police at as their champions in preventing and resolving trouble that unknown persons might cause, but beyond this, they have very little use for law. When problems occur, most people do not seriously consider recourse to legal officials, and, in fact, they generally act as if law did not exist at all. In this sense, suburbia is a king of limited anarchy. (127)

In conclusion:

suburbia is a model of social order. The order is not born, however, of conditions widely perceived to generate social harmony. It does not arise from intimacy and connectedness, but rather from some of the very things more often presumed to bring about conflict and violence – transiency, fragmentation, isolation, atomization, and indifference among people. The suburbs lack social cohesion but they are free of strife. They are, so to speak, disorganized and orderly at the same time. (134)

All of this does not lend itself to addressing social issues or community problems. If people are used to leaving each other alone and avoiding conflict, what happens when legitimate structural issues arise? Or, what happens when others make the case that addressing a structural issue is necessary or helpful? Or, if there is need, how do people used to moral minimalism respond? Convincing suburbanites to move on from moral minimalism, particularly when it seems to “work” in wealthier, whiter communities where people have the resources and agency to generally do what they want (having a single-family home, a good life for their kids, etc.), is a difficult task.

14 thoughts on “Moral minimalism and addressing social issues

  1. Pingback: Suburban police and promoting a better future for youth | Legally Sociable

  2. Pingback: Connecting urban planning and coping with COVID-19 | Legally Sociable

  3. Pingback: Leisure differences by race and class in time of COVID-19 | Legally Sociable

  4. Pingback: Some suburbanites do not like more explicit divisiveness or racism | Legally Sociable

  5. Pingback: The current social contract: we get along by leaving each other alone | Legally Sociable

  6. Pingback: Patterns in political yard signs | Legally Sociable

  7. Pingback: Online real estate shift during COVID-19 reinforces the private nature of American homes | Legally Sociable

  8. Pingback: Four hidden costs of moving to the suburbs | Legally Sociable

  9. Pingback: Continuing suburban life next to a Karen | Legally Sociable

  10. Pingback: Trying to attract suburban voters by fighting Critical Race Theory | Legally Sociable

  11. Pingback: Walking to go somewhere or interact with people in contrast to walking suburban loops for exercise | Legally Sociable

  12. Pingback: The problem of loud noises in suburbia | Legally Sociable

  13. Pingback: The problems with suburbs: carelessness, lack of community | Legally Sociable

  14. Pingback: Fights between suburban neighbors turn more rancorous, according to lawyers | Legally Sociable

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s