Walkable + suburban = desirable “surban” places

Homebuyers may still desire to live in the suburbs but they now may want a different kind of suburbia: a walkable, denser, vibrant place.

No longer are McMansions, white picket fences and sprawling square footage topping suburban buyers’ most-wanted list. Instead, proximity to a suburb’s downtown and easy access to restaurants, schools and parks are priorities. For many, walkable suburbs reign supreme…

The shift toward more walkable suburbs started over the past two decades, thanks to planning efforts concentrated on creating mini-downtowns to revive traditional suburban centers, said Kheir Al-Kodmany, a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago’s College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs…

A 2017 study by the National Association of Realtors found that walkers span the generations. Sixty-two percent of millennials and 55 percent of those born before 1944 prefer walkable communities and brief commutes, even if it means living in an apartment or town home. And 53 percent of Americans would give up a home with a large yard in exchange for a home with a smaller yard that’s within walking distance of the community’s amenities, according to the study. That figure is up from 48 percent in 2015…

A 2016 study from realty site Redfin seems to support Dunne’s point. The study took into account more than 1 million home sales between January 2014 and April 2016 and found that homes with higher walk scores tend to have higher sales prices than comparable homes in less walkable areas. One walk score point can increase a home’s price by an average of $3,250. In Chicago, the study found an increase of one walk score point can bump a home’s price by $2,437.

I intentionally cited the broader data from the article (and not just the anecdotes from buyers, realtors, and local suburbs) because there should be an open question involved with this article: do we have a certified trend toward more walkable suburbs? Do we have clear population data showing people moving to walkable suburbs rather than other places? For a variety of reasons, including enhancing local tax bases and environmental concerns, this has indeed been an emphasis in a number of suburbs across the United States in recent decades. But, I would also guess that it is primarily in suburbs that have more traditional downtowns and mass transit options. In the Chicago region, this means the “surban” experience is easier to create in communities founded before World War II and along the major passenger railroad lines.

This possible shift also does not fit easily into the common narrative that suburbs and cities are locked in mortal combat and there are clear winners and losers. What if in the long term Americans want some of both city and suburban life: a little less density, a single-family home with a yard, a smaller town or city where they feel they can influence local government or organizations if need be, and also walkable and not just a bedroom suburb? Arguably, this tension has been behind the American suburbs for over a century: Americans want a mix of urban and country life. A denser suburbia may just be the newest manifestation of this ongoing balance.

25 thoughts on “Walkable + suburban = desirable “surban” places

  1. Pingback: Why Americans love suburbs #1: single-family homes | Legally Sociable

  2. Pingback: Why Americans love suburbs #5: cars and driving | Legally Sociable

  3. Pingback: Resist the social engineering of mass transit but ignore the social engineering of suburbia | Legally Sociable

  4. Pingback: Building amenity-filled suburban apartments to encourage community | Legally Sociable

  5. Pingback: Will millennials kill McMansions? | Legally Sociable

  6. Pingback: “To urbanists, suburbia is self-evidently evil” | Legally Sociable

  7. Pingback: McMansion values still slow to recover in one wealthy Chicago suburb | Legally Sociable

  8. Pingback: Bringing the cool parts of suburban life to urban settings | Legally Sociable

  9. Pingback: Rethink Rezoning, Save Main responses share similar concerns – Part Two | Legally Sociable

  10. Pingback: Alcohol and the gendered suburbs: suburban bros with beer versus suburban moms with wine | Legally Sociable

  11. Pingback: Mapping vehicle emissions in the Chicago metropolitan region | Legally Sociable

  12. Pingback: Looking for stories of millennials and young adults who want to and enjoy living in suburban homes | Legally Sociable

  13. Pingback: Imagine the American suburbs shrunk by a factor of five | Legally Sociable

  14. Pingback: Millennials looking for “hipsturbia”? | Legally Sociable

  15. Pingback: Addressing the many less-than-3-mile trips in suburban settings | Legally Sociable

  16. Pingback: Proposing the rowhouse as the solution to an over-priced housing, McMansion world | Legally Sociable

  17. Pingback: Where will the new work from home people in suburbs and other places want to settle and spend their money? | Legally Sociable

  18. Pingback: Paint a rural over windows to obscure sizable suburban development going up next door | Legally Sociable

  19. Pingback: Reasons for suburban legislators leading the Illinois Democrats | Legally Sociable

  20. Pingback: “Welcome to the Metroburb” in the NW Chicago suburbs | Legally Sociable

  21. Pingback: A denser suburbia in California and the rest of the United States | Legally Sociable

  22. Pingback: The real New (Sub)Urbanism in the United States: a 10 minute drive from daily needs | Legally Sociable

  23. Pingback: Can a suburban newspaper call for less driving and two long-term options for minimizing driving in suburbs | Legally Sociable

  24. Pingback: Building a car-free 1,000 person development in Arizona | Legally Sociable

  25. Pingback: Two numbers that show how much space the United States devotes to parking | Legally Sociable

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s